A new idea for the openSUSE 'app store' that simplifies and builds on the basis of our existing technologies.

By -
For a long time now there has been a great deal of buzz about potentially having a fully featured app store on +openSUSE . Whether it was Bretzn or porting the +Ubuntu Software Center, we certainly would like to have a more informative GUI for discovering and installing software. At present we do in fact have a halfway solution in our software.opensuse.org interface with it's direct install (formerly 'one-click') which is awesome, and certainly is one thing that makes my job easier when I bring new users from Windows.



However, there are a number of areas where this interface falls short. The most glaring can be that often the applications lack a description or have one so short as to be nearly useless. Another significant point is the lack of user reviews. Reviews help flesh out things that may be missed in a description, as well as provide tips at a glance on what the new user should expect. I believe reviews would be reasonably easy to implement in the current domain, and getting more robust descriptions should not be terribly difficult.

I think using our current technologies as a base, we could easily create a simple, elegant, and easy to maintain app store.

  • Add reviews, ratings, pictures, and robust descriptions to http://www.software.opensuse.org
  • Add a 'cart' to the domain, where a user could select multiple software packages for installation. To 'check out' with this cart would prompt the domain to generate a YMP with all the packages selected previously, installing all of them akin to our Multimedia One-Click.
  • Refine the search function to more easily search by descriptions or meta tags vs. the current search which works best for specific package names.
  • Create a small browser window (probably using QWebView) which would exclusively display the domain, and allow the download and opening of a YMP.
In this solution we create an interface that would be intuitive and user friendly to any new user, without having to make any changes to our package management stack or having to maintain especially complicated software. Also, since most of the 'app store' would be running on web standard technologies it would be highly maintainable considering the massive volume of developers who have web experience and knowledge.

Of course we can later add a number of social functions such as Facebook and Google+ integrations. We may also find it useful to tie in an authentication system tied in with the social desktop. But for core functions, this is not even remotely necessary.


Comments

Post a Comment

Please share your insights, opinions, or questions. In that order preferably :p

Popular posts from this blog

Dual Boot configuration for Windows 10 and openSUSE with full UEFI and Secureboot support

By -
Image
Questions and preamble As has become normal, the FOSS/Linux community is peppered with anxiety over yet another major change to the tech landscape issuing forth from Redmond. With the release of Windows 10 comes a great many questions for the thoughtful, and this is especially true for our very own Linux communities. With gratitude we can recall our own past relief upon discovering that UEFI and Secureboot are not the herald of the end-times we had feared them to be. That being so does not however relieve the question of safely upgrading our dual-booting computers to Windows 10 without losing our ability to run Linux in tandem. Excitement for Windows 10 was largely absent in me. I had grown quickly comfortable to the Windows 8.1 work-flow as it shared some similarities in those key areas which I had already grown to love in the GNOME Shell. Further, Windows served a role limited to usage for proprietary software that I deemed not sensible to coax into service on a Linux OS. Howev...
Read more

Life without Netflix, streaming on Linux can be awesome!

By -
    For all the hype around Netflix it is easy for us Linux users to forget there are alternatives. Its not that Netflix is (debateably) the best, but rather its the most widely used that causes us to neglect the numerous options that are actually available to us. In this article I want to present some of those alternatives, and how they hold up against Netflix. One caveat however is that I cannot fairly compare the variety and quality of the programming selections of each service seeing as the former is too large to parse, and the latter is inherently subjective.     First off, when we are talking about Netflix we should consider why it is that it is so dominant. The opinions will vary, but I'll present my analysis. Hands down, Netflix has the largest selection of streaming movies, but that is where its superiority ends. Though there are many services, most are either too narrow, too expensive, or lack content; thus I will not cover them since we are lo...
Read more

YaST is being rewritten in Ruby; Geeko gets a nosejob

By -
For those not intimately familiar with +SUSE  and +openSUSE  , it bears mentioning what YaST actually is. YaST is our administrative control panel, composed of numerous modules for Software Management, User Management, Partitioning, and a variety of other tasks. It has interfaces implemented with +GTK  , +Qt Project  , and a command line interface. The command line interface is particularly nice in the case that you are running a server without a graphical environment, or if for some reason your graphical environment is not working. YaST even powers our very advanced graphical installer, providing us with power and stability during the install process that I haven't seen any other distribution able to replicate. WebYaST brings the power of YaST to remote administration, allowing you to remotely administer your machines from a comfortable web-based graphical interface. For a couple of years now I've been hearing rumors about YaST being swit...
Read more